Author
Owners and managing directors of UK panel building businesses are currently finding their profit margins under severe pressure from several directions.
Labour costs are rising, supply chains and component availability remains unpredictable, and customers are increasingly expecting shorter lead times without any corresponding flexibility on price.
Against that backdrop, the businesses that are best positioned to protect and grow their margins are those that have addressed inefficiency at the point where it originates. In panel building, this is almost always at the engineering stage.
Where Inefficiency Hides in Engineering
Unfortunately, engineering inefficiencies are rarely clear on a P&L.
They are part of the hidden costs within extended project cycles, late-stage corrections, lost shopfloor time waiting for accurate documentation, and in the accumulated overheads of skilled engineers spending significant portions of their working week on tasks that add no engineering value whatsoever.
Individually these costs can appear modest, but across a business running multiple concurrent projects they represent a material and largely avoidable drag on profitability.
How Manual Engineering Processes Erode Profitability
When engineering relies on manual processes and disconnected tools rather than standardised, integrated workflows, projects take longer than they should because engineers are recreating work that should already exist in reusable form.
Design errors that could be caught instantaneously are instead discovered during production, at which point the cost of correcting it is a multiple of what it would have been at the drawing stage.
Documents and reports such as bills of materials (BOMs) can carry inaccuracies that pass to procurement, generating the wrong orders, as well as emergency reorders along with premium shipping costs.
And because engineering knowledge tends to accumulate with individuals rather than within shared systems, capacity becomes structurally dependent on the availability of a small number of senior people.
The Value of Investing in Engineering Digitalisation
The result is that the more manually intensive the engineering process, the more pressure lands on experienced staff. This then limits throughput and makes it harder to bring less experienced engineers up to productive speed.
With margins being squeezed, companies are turning to technology and automation as the primary operational efficiency drivers, rather than simply through winning more work.
How Eplan's ECAD Platform Removes Structural Inefficiency
Eplan addresses inefficiencies at a structural level by replacing manual, disconnected engineering processes with an integrated platform.
Eplan’s integration with ERP, PLM, and PDM systems means that accurate design data flows continuously to procurement and production without being re-entered or reformatted, removing one of the most common sources of error in the handover between engineering and the shopfloor. Lead times are often shortened by several days per project.
Bills of materials (BOMs) are generated as your engineers work rather than compiled separately at the end of the design process, so they are passed to procurement already validated.
Eplan’s schematics are also linked to manufacturer component data rather than static records, so any changes to product ranges propagate automatically rather than requiring manual updates across multiple documents.
And its reusable macro libraries allow previously ratified circuit assemblies to be reused across projects rather than redrawn from scratch each time. This reduces engineering hours for each new project and reduces the risk of introducing new errors.
In fact, designing a cabinet in Eplan’s 3D software has been shown to be 10 to 20 times quicker than drawing the same with 2D schematics (source: Engineering 4.0: 2019 European 4.0 Transformation Center GmbH and Eplan).
Finally, Rittal's online shop, MyRittal, means your procurement team works directly from live product data with real-time stock visibility for enclosures, cooling and associated accessories, providing reassurance and certainty at a time of extreme supply chain disruption.
The Strategic Case for a Digital Engineering Roadmap
From a strategic perspective, what Eplan represents for a panel building business is a shift from engineering as a manually intensive cost centre towards engineering as a standardised asset, offering real business development potential.
Engineer output per capita increases, so productivity rises without the need for additional headcount.
Project lead times will be more predictable, which strengthens customer confidence and reduces the likelihood of penalty clauses being triggered.
What’s more, your less experienced engineers will be able to offer a more meaningful contribution because they are working within a validated framework rather than starting a new project under pressure. The embedded knowledge that currently sits with your senior team will sit within the system, making your business more resilient and easier to scale.
If you are a UK panel builder looking to grow capacity and protect your margins, then your engineering team is probably a key area to focus on and one where the returns on investment in digital tooling could be most tangible.
If you would like to discuss what that might mean in practice for your business, please get in touch with our team.
Comments